Same here.

The declaration contradicting the return address is what gets it opened. Not on Deutsche Post but the pattern is familiar.

Interdose restlessness is distinct from the original symptom and worth naming separately. A year in on the unread posts view and it lines up.

Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable.

Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism.

Interdose restlessness is distinct from the original symptom and worth naming separately.

File early.

It gets smaller. Not easy, smaller. That distinction kept me going.

How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?