Followed, this answered three questions I had.

Narrow conclusion.

This board overrates bloodwork. A number moving is not the outcome you wanted.

Three month limits are cumulative across parcels in more places than people realise.

Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take.

The declaration contradicting the return address is what gets it opened.

Interdose restlessness is distinct from the original symptom and worth naming separately.

How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?