Small thing that made a difference for me with a second opinion. No equipment needed and it costs nothing.
You have two changes at once here. You cannot attribute anything until one of them moves.
Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism.
Same here.
Tolerance was my main issue with a second opinion too.
Same here.
Tolerance was my main issue with a second opinion too.
Fifteen years of this and the function column is the only one that changed anything for me. Also, one page of history, printed, handed over at the start. It changes the appointment.
How do you tell the difference between the drug working and just a good week? Same for me with a second opinion, unfortunately.
I would stop trying to convey how bad it is and start saying what you want them to do.
Sorry for the basic question, but how do you actually start one of these diaries?
Same here.
Same here.
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable.