Trying to separate three different claims about vitamin K2: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
Vivid dreams and mild headache for the first 12 days, then nothing. Textbook for this class, apparently.
My rule now: if a claim cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.
Willing to accept that my own experience is the weakest evidence in the room.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
This board overrates bloodwork. A number moving is not the outcome you wanted.
Same here.
Same here.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Same here.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?