Trying to separate three different claims about CJC-1295: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
Loose evidence is not the same as no evidence and people overcorrect in both directions.
The animal data is stronger than the human data and the human data is not nothing, it is just small.
Water retention and mild lethargy in the first fortnight are the usual pattern.
Willing to accept that my own experience is the weakest evidence in the room.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything. Same for me with CJC-1295, unfortunately.
Baseline first.
Read the methods section. It is the only part that says whether the conclusion is allowed to exist.
I would take the narrow conclusion. Broad ones are more interesting and less true.
My rule, after years of this: if it cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration.
Same here.