Trying to separate three different claims about LL-37: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
Sample size, blinding, and who paid for it. Those three questions kill most of the confidence in most of these threads.
Injection site reactions are trivial until they are not, and a fresh needling technique removes half of them.
Happy to be corrected on any of the above.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all? Currently on LL-37 myself.
Baseline first.
Name the active ingredient, not just the brand. It makes these threads searchable years later.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
Most of what is called evidence here is one person, one vial, one month.
Read the methods section. It is the only part that says whether the conclusion is allowed to exist.