I have been running ipamorelin for two years and the honest summary is that the effect is smaller than the internet suggests and real.
I have started logging dose, time, and sleep because otherwise the anecdote is just a mood.
What the growth hormone secretagogue class does pharmacologically does not require the subjective effect to be large to be real.
The animal data is stronger than the human data and the human data is not nothing, it is just small.
I would rather have a narrow conclusion and be right than a broad one and be interesting.
Posting to be argued with, mainly.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Reconstitution arithmetic is only half the problem. The other half is what was in the vial.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Three questions kill most of the confidence in a thread like this: sample size, blinding, who paid. Two years in on ipamorelin and it lines up.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at. How long have you been on ipamorelin?
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at.
Same here.
Currently on ipamorelin myself.