Long post, sorry. GHK-Cu: what actually has human evidence behind it, and what is extrapolation from animals?
Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration.
The measured outcome and the hoped-for outcome are rarely the same thing in these threads.
What the peptide class does pharmacologically does not require the subjective effect to be large to be real.
If you need three other compounds to notice the first one, you have not tested the first one.
Vial content, sterility and reconstitution are three separate questions and the certificate answers about one of them.
How do you separate the compound effect from the routine around it?
Most of the popular protocol is borrowed from a clinical population and applied to healthy people without comment.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
If it needs three other compounds to notice, you have not tested the first one.
Same here.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything? How long have you been on GHK-Cu?
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?