Trying to separate three different claims about aniracetam: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation.
My rule, after years of this: if it cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing. Headaches was my main issue with aniracetam too.
Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration. Headaches was my main issue with aniracetam too.
Sterility is the part people wave through and it is the part that actually bites.
I would take the narrow conclusion. Broad ones are more interesting and less true.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Three questions kill most of the confidence in a thread like this: sample size, blinding, who paid.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero? Headaches was my main issue with aniracetam too.
Narrow conclusion.