Bloodwork question about trenbolone acetate. Baseline, four months in, and the numbers moved in a direction I did not expect.
Vivid dreams and mild headache for the first 6 days, then nothing. Textbook for this class, apparently.
Most of the popular protocols are borrowed from clinical populations and applied to healthy people without comment.
Mechanism is not outcome, and a plausible pathway is the most expensive kind of evidence there is.
Haematocrit creep is the boring one that catches people at the six week mark.
Interested in the methods more than the conclusion.
Baseline first.
A certificate of analysis answers one question and gets quoted as though it answers four.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Loose evidence and no evidence are different, and people overcorrect in both directions.
A certificate of analysis answers one question and gets quoted as though it answers four.
A certificate of analysis answers one question and gets quoted as though it answers four.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything? Currently on trenbolone acetate myself.
Three questions kill most of the confidence in a thread like this: sample size, blinding, who paid.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.