Trying to separate three different claims about sustanon: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
I have started logging dose, time, and sleep because otherwise the anecdote is just a mood.
What surprised me is how much of the perceived benefit was routine and attention rather than pharmacology.
Mechanism is not outcome, and a plausible pathway is the most expensive kind of evidence there is.
Two weeks is not enough time to attribute anything to a compound unless the effect is dramatic.
Posting to be argued with, mainly.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
Same here.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at. Not on sustanon but the pattern is familiar.
Baseline first.
Sleep, food, or the compound? Yes.