Bloodwork question about ostarine. Baseline, a year in, and the numbers moved in a direction I did not expect.
Sample size, blinding, and who paid for it. Those three questions kill most of the confidence in most of these threads.
Loose evidence is not the same as no evidence and people overcorrect in both directions.
Suppression is real and milder than the AAS equivalent, which is not the same as absent.
Anyone got a paper worth reading on this rather than a write-up of a paper?
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation.
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation.
Same here.
Same for me with ostarine, unfortunately.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing. Same for me with ostarine, unfortunately.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything? A year in on ostarine and it lines up.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?
This is the kind of post the forum exists for.
Most of the popular protocol is borrowed from a clinical population and applied to healthy people without comment.