I have been running RAD-140 for a year and the honest summary is that the effect is smaller than the internet suggests and real.
Sample size, blinding, and who paid for it. Those three questions kill most of the confidence in most of these threads.
What surprised me is how much of the perceived benefit was routine and attention rather than pharmacology.
Interested in the methods more than the conclusion.
Reconstitution arithmetic is only half the problem. The other half is what was in the vial.
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at. A year in on RAD-140 and it lines up.