I do not think a single nandrolone decanoate study settles anything, but the aggregate is more interesting than any individual paper.
Forum consensus and published consensus diverged here about five years ago and never reconverged.
What the anabolic class does pharmacologically does not require the subjective effect to be large to be real.
Loose evidence is not the same as no evidence and people overcorrect in both directions.
Bloodwork before opinions. Everything else here is a guess with better marketing.
Curious whether the popular dose has any basis or is just the convenient one.
Same here.
My rule, after years of this: if it cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing. Currently on nandrolone decanoate myself.