Trying to separate three different claims about trenbolone enanthate: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
What the anabolic class does pharmacologically does not require the subjective effect to be large to be real.
Loose evidence is not the same as no evidence and people overcorrect in both directions.
Haematocrit creep is the boring one that catches people at the six week mark.
Happy to be corrected on any of the above.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Read the methods section. It is the only part that says whether the conclusion is allowed to exist.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at. Currently on trenbolone enanthate myself.