Interdose restlessness is distinct from the original symptom and worth naming separately.

Three month limits are cumulative across parcels in more places than people realise.

Reconstitution arithmetic is only half the problem. The other half is what was in the vial.

Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable.

The declaration contradicting the return address is what gets it opened. Tolerance was my main issue with the de minimis threshold too.

Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism. Not on a specialist wait but the pattern is familiar.

Sterility is the part people wave through and it is the part that actually bites.