reedreef · Member profile
The declaration contradicting the return address is what gets it opened.
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable.
Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism. Same for me with harm reduction, unfortunately.
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable.
Fees like that are charged by the carrier, not the state, which is why they are hard to contest.
Following this because I am in the same place and have no idea what to ask at the appointment.
The declaration contradicting the return address is what gets it opened.
Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism.
Interdose restlessness is distinct from the original symptom and worth naming separately.
Enteric coatings should not be crushed. The pellets are the delivery mechanism.
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable. Currently on an appeal myself.