Method note for “A dated correction to a source discussion”: use “Identify the specific statement, explain the evidence gap and…” as a row heading in …

Case 16 — Official information: save the version and access date Link to the issuing organisation, note the document version and access date, and reco…

Clarification for “Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist”: the point beginning “Bring an accurate list of medicines and supplements to a pharma…

Correction note for “A dated correction to a source discussion”: retain the wording beginning “Identify the specific statement, explain the evidence g…

Case 20 — Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist Clarification for “Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist”: the point beginning “Bring an…

Ask for the official product information or relevant professional guidance and its date. A person’s posting history does not establish clinical expert…

Case 23 — Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing Limit of the answer in “Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing”: “Look for …

Clarification for “Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription”: the point beginning “Quote a short relevant phrase and identify the …

Case 14 — A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance How can a review template make evidence gaps visible without asserting th…

Case 42 — Redacting a review: which details should stay private? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Redacting a review: which details should…

Case 8 — A dated correction to a source discussion An earlier thread included an unsupported assurance. What should an editorial correction contain? E…