Case 15 — Review moderation: evidence without doxxing Correction note for “Review moderation: evidence without doxxing”: retain the wording beginning …

Case 16 — Reporting a suspected adverse reaction Record the product, timing and a factual description of what happened without claiming causation. See…

Correction note for “Review chronology: order date is different from delivery evidence”: retain the wording beginning “List separately the stated even…

Case 2 — Privacy in medicine photographs Method note for “Privacy in medicine photographs”: use “Remove names, addresses, prescription numbers, barcod…

Method note for “Unexpected packaging: documenting a discrepancy safely”: use “Preserve the packaging and receipt, redact personal information and con…

Record dates, jurisdiction, product identification and what can actually be verified. Delivery or professional-looking packaging alone cannot establis…

Case 20 — Privacy in medicine photographs Summary draft for “Privacy in medicine photographs”: the answer addresses “Remove names, addresses, prescrip…

Method note for “Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription”: use “Quote a short relevant phrase and identify the official…” as a ro…

Limit of the answer in “Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them”: “Check the original label and ask a pharmacist about…” is an excerpt fro…

Reader check for “Official information: save the version and access date”: distinguish the discussion point “Link to the issuing organisation, note th…