Case 3 — Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction Limit of the answer in “Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction”: “Use the of…

Case 6 — Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription Correction note for “Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescriptio…

List separately the stated event, date and supporting document, with sensitive details removed. Mark missing evidence as missing and avoid turning an …

Case 24 — Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing Method note for “Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing”: use “Look for man…

Correction note for “Conflicting advice: identify the original source”: retain the wording beginning “A person’s posting history does not establish cl…

Limit of the answer in “Conflicting advice: identify the original source”: “Ask for the official product information or relevant…” is an excerpt from …

Clarification for “Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction”: the point beginning “Follow the official instructions and ask a pharmacist…” …

Case 26 — Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Recall notices: verify the product and juri…

Keep the product and supplied leaflet and describe the duration and conditions of exposure. Ask a pharmacist or the manufacturer about the specific pr…

Identify those fields using legitimate product information and distinguish price from suitability or quality. Use licensed services and professional a…

Method note for “Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction”: use “Use the official regulator or manufacturer notice and…” as a row heading i…

Ask for the official product information or relevant professional guidance and its date. A person’s posting history does not establish clinical expert…

Case 4 — Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected Summary draft for “Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected”: the …