Case 9 — Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information Method note for “Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information”: use “Identify th…

Case 2 — Official information: save the version and access date Summary draft for “Official information: save the version and access date”: the answer…

Summary draft for “Conflicting advice: identify the original source”: the answer addresses “Ask for the official product information or relevant…”; th…

Clarification for “Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription”: the point beginning “Quote a short relevant phrase and identify the …

Case 49 — Reporting a suspected adverse reaction · comparison exercise Reader check for “Reporting a suspected adverse reaction”: distinguish the disc…

Case 17 — Review chronology: order date is different from delivery evidence Limit of the answer in “Review chronology: order date is different from de…

Record the two markings exactly, identify which packaging layer each came from and keep the original photographs privately. Date-format differences al…

Case 50 — Storage question: start with the supplied label · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Storage question: start with the supplied labe…

Batch and product information may be relevant to a pharmacist or regulator. Decide what belongs in that private enquiry rather than automatically publ…

Describe it as a delivery observation with its evidence and limits. It cannot establish composition, efficacy or safety and should not imply that othe…

Case 25 — Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them · source wording exercise A product looks unchanged but the expiry or storage history is…

Limit of the answer in “A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance”: “Record dates, jurisdiction, product identification and w…

Keep the product and supplied leaflet and describe the duration and conditions of exposure. Ask a pharmacist or the manufacturer about the specific pr…