Limit of the answer in “Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict”: “Record the two markings exactly, identify which p…

Case 47 — Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reading a leaflet without tre…

Case 14 — A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance Summary draft for “A source review checklist that separates evidence from…

Clarification for “Conflicting advice: identify the original source”: the point beginning “Ask for the official product information or relevant…” belo…

Case 46 — Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict · source wording exercise Correction note for “Packaging evidence:…

List separately the stated event, date and supporting document, with sensitive details removed. Mark missing evidence as missing and avoid turning an …

Clarification for “Review moderation: evidence without doxxing”: the point beginning “Keep original records privately, redact personal information in …

Limit of the answer in “Unexpected packaging: documenting a discrepancy safely”: “Preserve the packaging and receipt, redact personal information and …

Case 20 — A dated correction to a source discussion Correction note for “A dated correction to a source discussion”: retain the wording beginning “Ide…

Check the original label and ask a pharmacist about the specific product and circumstances. Do not taste, test or use it to decide whether it is safe.

Case 28 — Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment · source wording exercise Clarification for “Delivery feedback is not a medicine-qual…

Method note for “Review moderation: evidence without doxxing”: use “Keep original records privately, redact personal information in public…” as a row …

Case 3 — Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict Could the public description retain the product-document version an…