Clarification for “Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict”: the point beginning “Record the two markings exactly, i…

Case 47 — Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reading a leaflet without treating…

Case 14 — A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance Limit of the answer in “A source review checklist that separates evidence…

Case 46 — Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict · source wording exercise Method note for “Packaging evidence: a m…

Method note for “Unexpected packaging: documenting a discrepancy safely”: use “Preserve the packaging and receipt, redact personal information and con…

Clarification for “Unexpected packaging: documenting a discrepancy safely”: the point beginning “Preserve the packaging and receipt, redact personal i…

Case 20 — A dated correction to a source discussion Method note for “A dated correction to a source discussion”: use “Identify the specific statement,…

Link to the issuing organisation, note the document version and access date, and record later corrections. Do not present an archived extract as curre…

Keep original records privately, redact personal information in public and describe only verifiable events. Avoid personal allegations or claims about…

Case 27 — A dated correction to a source discussion · source wording exercise Reader check for “A dated correction to a source discussion”: distinguis…

Keep original records privately, redact personal information in public and describe only verifiable events. Avoid personal allegations or claims about…

Case 3 — Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict Record the two markings exactly, identify which packaging layer eac…

Case 12 — A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance Correction note for “A source review checklist that separates evidence fr…