Case 44 — Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict · source wording exercise Reader check for “Packaging evidence: a …

Case 34 — Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing · source wording exercise Method note for “Discontinued packaging versus an unverified l…

Case 9 — Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information Clarification for “Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information”: the point begi…

Case 2 — Official information: save the version and access date Limit of the answer in “Official information: save the version and access date”: “Link…

Ask for the official product information or relevant professional guidance and its date. A person’s posting history does not establish clinical expert…

The closing summary should distinguish the observed discrepancy from any later verified explanation and link the official information that supports th…

Case 46 — Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist · source wording exercise Correction note for “Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist”: r…

Case 14 — A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance How can a review template make evidence gaps visible without asserting th…

Correction note for “Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment”: retain the wording beginning “Describe it as a delivery observation with…

Case 45 — Dispatch email versus carrier acceptance: how should the timeline read? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Dispatch email versus…

Method note for “A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance”: use “Record dates, jurisdiction, product identification and what…

Use opaque redactions in a flattened exported copy, then reopen that copy and inspect it at full size. Do not rely on a translucent marker or a revers…

Case 19 — Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing Correction note for “Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing”: retain the wo…