Case 16 — Review moderation: evidence without doxxing Clarification for “Review moderation: evidence without doxxing”: the point beginning “Keep origi…

Case 5 — Official information: save the version and access date Clarification for “Official information: save the version and access date”: the point …

Case 195 — Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription · scope exercise Limit of the answer in “Reading a leaflet without treating a …

Summary draft for “Official information: save the version and access date”: the answer addresses “Do not present an archived extract as current…”; the…

Case 9 — Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction Use the official regulator or manufacturer notice and match product, batch and jurisdicti…

Case 12 — A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance Method note for “A source review checklist that separates evidence from r…

Case 30 — Reporting a suspected adverse reaction · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reporting a suspected adverse reaction”: distinguish the …

Method note for “Cold-chain questions: missing records are still missing”: use “It does not establish conditions…” as a row heading in a proposed work…

Case 17 — Redacting a review: which details should stay private? Use opaque redactions in a flattened exported copy, then reopen that copy and inspect…

Case 46 — Privacy in medicine photographs · source wording exercise Method note for “Privacy in medicine photographs”: use “Retain the unedited origin…

Case 19 — Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them Clarification for “Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them”: the point begin…

Case 4 — Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict An ordinary forum review cannot certify a medicine. If the product …