Case 15 — Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment A review only documents delivery speed. How should its scope be stated? Exercise PHAR…

Case 22 — Review moderation: evidence without doxxing A disputed review includes private contact details. How can evidence be retained responsibly? Ex…

Case 3 — Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription Correction note for “Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescriptio…

Limit of the answer in “Conflicting advice: identify the original source”: “Ask for the official product information or relevant…” is an excerpt from …

Case 45 — Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected · source wording exercise Correction note for “Source-review index: unresolved, do…

Case 174 — Cold-chain questions: missing records are still missing · reader check exercise Limit of the answer in “Cold-chain questions: missing recor…

Case 46 — Redacting a review: which details should stay private? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Redacting a review: which details s…

Use opaque redactions in a flattened exported copy, then reopen that copy and inspect it at full size. Do not rely on a translucent marker or a revers…

Limit of the answer in “A useful source-review update: what changed since the opening post?”: “Do not label the case resolved until the…” is an excerp…

Case 9 — Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing Summary draft for “Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing”: the answer addre…

Record the two markings exactly, identify which packaging layer each came from and keep the original photographs privately. Date-format differences al…

Case 25 — Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction · source wording exercise Method note for “Recall notices: verify the product and jurisd…

Case 34 — Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict · source wording exercise Reader check for “Packaging evidence: a …