Case 6 — Privacy in medicine photographs Clarification for “Privacy in medicine photographs”: the point beginning “Remove names, addresses, prescripti…

Case 7 — Storage question: start with the supplied label Method note for “Storage question: start with the supplied label”: use “Keep the product and …

Case 36 — Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing · source wording exercise Correction note for “Discontinued packaging versus an unverifi…

Case 10 — Reporting a suspected adverse reaction Limit of the answer in “Reporting a suspected adverse reaction”: “Record the product, timing and a fa…

Case 138 — Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict · correction exercise A documentation exercise has an outer carto…

Case 9 — Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information Correction note for “Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information”: retain the w…

Correction note for “Conflicting advice: identify the original source”: retain the wording beginning “Ask for the official product information or rele…

Case 21 — Redacting a review: which details should stay private? Use opaque redactions in a flattened exported copy, then reopen that copy and inspect…

A correction entry should show the old statement, the revision and the supporting record. If a claim cannot be substantiated, remove its assertion fro…

Method note for “Review chronology: order date is different from delivery evidence”: use “List separately the stated event, date and supporting…” as a…

Case 32 — Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Expiry questions: why appearance cannot set…

Reader check for “Reporting a suspected adverse reaction”: distinguish the discussion point “Record the product, timing and a factual description of…”…