Case 8 — Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription Summary draft for “Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription”…

Case 136 — Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected · correction exercise Clarification for “Source-review index: unresolved, documen…

Case 7 — Reporting a suspected adverse reaction Summary draft for “Reporting a suspected adverse reaction”: the answer addresses “Record the product, …

Method note for “A dated correction to a source discussion”: use “Identify the specific statement, explain the evidence gap and…” as a row heading in …

Case 19 — Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict Could the public description retain the product-document version a…

Clarification for “Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected”: the point beginning “Use clear evidence-status labels and dates, and li…

Record dates, jurisdiction, product identification and what can actually be verified. Delivery or professional-looking packaging alone cannot establis…

Case 30 — Conflicting advice: identify the original source · source wording exercise Reader check for “Conflicting advice: identify the original sourc…

Quote a short relevant phrase and identify the official leaflet version without sharing private details. Ask a pharmacist to explain how it applies to…

Case 43 — Review chronology: order date is different from delivery evidence · source wording exercise Method note for “Review chronology: order date i…

Case 3 — Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them Summary draft for “Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them”: the answer addre…

Case 19 — Cold-chain questions: missing records are still missing Limit of the answer in “Cold-chain questions: missing records are still missing”: “I…

Clarification for “Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing”: the point beginning “Look for manufacturer or regulator documentation and rec…