Case 34 — Cold-chain questions: missing records are still missing · source wording exercise Clarification for “Cold-chain questions: missing records a…

Method note for “Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them”: use “Do not taste, test or use it to…” as a row heading in a proposed working r…

Method note for “Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription”: use “Quote a short relevant phrase and identify the official…” as a ro…

Case 5 — Review chronology: order date is different from delivery evidence Correction note for “Review chronology: order date is different from delive…

Case 133 — Review moderation: evidence without doxxing · correction exercise A disputed review includes private contact details. How can evidence be r…

Case 4 — Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist Correction note for “Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist”: retain the wording beginning…

Remove names, addresses, prescription numbers, barcodes and account identifiers. Retain the unedited original privately for a pharmacist; avoid postin…

Case 16 — Official information: save the version and access date Clarification for “Official information: save the version and access date”: the point…

Clarification for “Keeping a medication list for an appointment”: the point beginning “Keep names, formulation, prescribed instructions and relevant q…

Case 28 — Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction · source wording exercise Correction note for “Recall notices: verify the product and ju…

Case 27 — A dated correction to a source discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A dated correction to a source discussion”: the answe…

Limit of the answer in “Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment”: “It cannot establish composition, efficacy or safety and should not i…

Case 40 — A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance · source wording exercise Clarification for “A source review checklist th…