Case 5 — Review chronology: order date is different from delivery evidence List separately the stated event, date and supporting document, with sensit…

Case 132 — Conflicting advice: identify the original source · correction exercise Limit of the answer in “Conflicting advice: identify the original so…

Case 4 — Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist Bring an accurate list of medicines and supplements to a pharmacist and state the question and r…

Case 15 — Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them Correction note for “Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them”: retain the wo…

Case 47 — Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Source-review index: unresolved,…

Case 28 — Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction · source wording exercise A shared recall headline lacks a batch number and country. Whi…

Case 27 — A dated correction to a source discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “A dated correction to a source discussion”: the point…

Batch and product information may be relevant to a pharmacist or regulator. Decide what belongs in that private enquiry rather than automatically publ…

Summary draft for “Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment”: the answer addresses “Describe it as a delivery observation with…”; the re…

Case 39 — Redacting a review: which details should stay private? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Redacting a review: which details shou…

Case 15 — Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist Summary draft for “Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist”: the answer addresses “Bring a…