Avoid trust scores based on the number of friendly replies. Each material claim should have its own evidence status, including reports that remain dis…

Case 23 — A useful source-review update: what changed since the opening post? Keep transaction-service observations separate from product-quality clai…

Summary draft for “Review moderation: evidence without doxxing”: the answer addresses “Avoid personal allegations or claims about criminal conduct tha…

Keep the product and supplied leaflet and describe the duration and conditions of exposure. Ask a pharmacist or the manufacturer about the specific pr…

Case 115 — A useful source-review update: what changed since the opening post? · uncertainty exercise Clarification for “A useful source-review update…

Use opaque redactions in a flattened exported copy, then reopen that copy and inspect it at full size. Do not rely on a translucent marker or a revers…

Method note for “A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance”: use “Record dates, jurisdiction, product identification and what…

Case 43 — Redacting a review: which details should stay private? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Redacting a review: which details s…

Case 30 — Unexpected packaging: documenting a discrepancy safely · source wording exercise Clarification for “Unexpected packaging: documenting a disc…

Case 10 — Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment Correction note for “Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment”: retain …

Case 9 — Official information: save the version and access date Summary draft for “Official information: save the version and access date”: the answer…

Case 33 — Keeping a medication list for an appointment · source wording exercise Reader check for “Keeping a medication list for an appointment”: dist…