Case 52 — A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance · comparison exercise Method note for “A source review checklist that sep…

Case 20 — Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected How can a review index distinguish an open question from a supported conclusion? E…

Summary draft for “Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing”: the answer addresses “Look for manufacturer or regulator documentation and re…

Could the public description retain the product-document version and market while removing identifying prescription data? The professional reviewing t…

Keep original records privately, redact personal information in public and describe only verifiable events. Avoid personal allegations or claims about…

Case 110 — Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them · uncertainty exercise Clarification for “Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settl…

Keep three separate fields: dispatch statement, label creation if recorded, and the first physical acceptance event shown by the carrier. State the ti…

Limit of the answer in “Conflicting advice: identify the original source”: “Ask for the official product information or relevant…” is an excerpt from …

Case 38 — Official information: save the version and access date · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Official information: save the vers…

Case 25 — Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict · source wording exercise Clarification for “Packaging evidence: a…

Case 5 — Reporting a suspected adverse reaction Correction note for “Reporting a suspected adverse reaction”: retain the wording beginning “Record the…

Case 4 — Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment Summary draft for “Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment”: the answer…

Case 28 — Cold-chain questions: missing records are still missing · source wording exercise Reader check for “Cold-chain questions: missing records ar…