Case 52 — A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance · comparison exercise Clarification for “A source review checklist that s…

Method note for “Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information”: use “Identify those fields using legitimate product information and distinguis…

Case 19 — Official information: save the version and access date Limit of the answer in “Official information: save the version and access date”: “Lin…

Method note for “Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing”: use “Look for manufacturer or regulator documentation and record the…” as a row…

Keep three separate fields: dispatch statement, label creation if recorded, and the first physical acceptance event shown by the carrier. State the ti…

Case 109 — Review moderation: evidence without doxxing · uncertainty exercise A disputed review includes private contact details. How can evidence be …

Method note for “Official information: save the version and access date”: use “Link to the issuing organisation, note the document version and…” as a …

Limit of the answer in “Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment”: “Describe it as a delivery observation with…” is an excerpt from the …

Limit of the answer in “Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment”: “Describe it as a delivery observation with…” is an excerpt from the …

Case 37 — Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them · source wording exercise Method note for “Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settl…

Case 24 — Dispatch email versus carrier acceptance: how should the timeline read? A order log contains a dispatch email on Friday and the first physic…

Case 4 — Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction Limit of the answer in “Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction”: “Use the of…

Case 3 — A dated correction to a source discussion Correction note for “A dated correction to a source discussion”: retain the wording beginning “Iden…