Case 52 — A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance · comparison exercise How can a review template make evidence gaps visibl…

Clarification for “Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information”: the point beginning “Identify those fields using legitimate product informat…

Case 19 — Official information: save the version and access date Clarification for “Official information: save the version and access date”: the point…

Limit of the answer in “Official information: save the version and access date”: “Link to the issuing organisation, note the document version and…” is…

Clarification for “Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing”: the point beginning “Look for manufacturer or regulator documentation and rec…

Case 108 — Conflicting advice: identify the original source · uncertainty exercise Method note for “Conflicting advice: identify the original source”:…

Check the original label and ask a pharmacist about the specific product and circumstances. Do not taste, test or use it to decide whether it is safe.

Case 36 — Review moderation: evidence without doxxing · source wording exercise Correction note for “Review moderation: evidence without doxxing”: ret…

Case 23 — Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected Clarification for “Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected”: the…

Case 3 — Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription Summary draft for “Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription”…

Case 3 — A dated correction to a source discussion An earlier thread included an unsupported assurance. What should an editorial correction contain? E…