Case 51 — Redacting a review: which details should stay private? · comparison exercise Reader check for “Redacting a review: which details should stay…

Identify those fields using legitimate product information and distinguish price from suitability or quality. Use licensed services and professional a…

Case 19 — Official information: save the version and access date Link to the issuing organisation, note the document version and access date, and reco…

Method note for “Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information”: use “Identify those fields using legitimate product information and distinguis…

Method note for “Official information: save the version and access date”: use “Link to the issuing organisation, note the document version and…” as a …

Case 108 — Conflicting advice: identify the original source · uncertainty exercise Two replies make incompatible claims but neither gives a source. Wh…

Case 31 — A useful source-review update: what changed since the opening post? · source wording exercise Clarification for “A useful source-review upda…

Look for manufacturer or regulator documentation and record the date and market it covers. Treat an unsupported explanation as unresolved, not as proo…

Case 36 — Review moderation: evidence without doxxing · source wording exercise Method note for “Review moderation: evidence without doxxing”: use “Av…

Case 23 — Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected How can a review index distinguish an open question from a supported conclusion? E…

Case 3 — Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription Limit of the answer in “Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescrip…

Case 2 — Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing Correction note for “Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing”: retain the wor…

Case 26 — Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Recall notices: verify the product and juri…