Case 28 — Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist · source wording exercise Clarification for “Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist”: the…

Limit of the answer in “Conflicting advice: identify the original source”: “Ask for the official product information or relevant…” is an excerpt from …

Case 25 — A dated correction to a source discussion · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A dated correction to a source discussion”: “Pre…

Case 51 — Redacting a review: which details should stay private? · comparison exercise Correction note for “Redacting a review: which details should s…

Case 18 — Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them Summary draft for “Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them”: the answer addr…

Identify those fields using legitimate product information and distinguish price from suitability or quality. Use licensed services and professional a…

Link to the issuing organisation, note the document version and access date, and record later corrections. Do not present an archived extract as curre…

Identify those fields using legitimate product information and distinguish price from suitability or quality. Use licensed services and professional a…

Case 107 — Keeping a medication list for an appointment · uncertainty exercise Summary draft for “Keeping a medication list for an appointment”: the a…

Case 30 — Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict · source wording exercise Reader check for “Packaging evidence: a …

Clarification for “Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information”: the point beginning “Identify those fields using legitimate product informat…

Case 36 — Review moderation: evidence without doxxing · source wording exercise A disputed review includes private contact details. How can evidence b…