Case 24 — Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing A listing says packaging changed but provides no official source. How should the claim b…

Link to the issuing organisation, note the document version and access date, and record later corrections. Do not present an archived extract as curre…

Case 47 — Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected · source wording exercise Reader check for “Source-review index: unresolved, docum…

Case 10 — Cold-chain questions: missing records are still missing Correction note for “Cold-chain questions: missing records are still missing”: retai…

Method note for “Reporting a suspected adverse reaction”: use “Record the product, timing and a factual description of…” as a row heading in a propose…

Clarification for “Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription”: the point beginning “Quote a short relevant phrase and identify the …

Case 92 — Redacting a review: which details should stay private? · documentation exercise Correction note for “Redacting a review: which details shoul…

Case 15 — Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription Limit of the answer in “Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescri…

Method note for “Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction”: use “Use the official regulator or manufacturer notice and…” as a row heading i…

Case 23 — Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment Summary draft for “Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment”: the answe…

Case 20 — A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance Correction note for “A source review checklist that separates evidence fr…

Case 7 — Review chronology: order date is different from delivery evidence Method note for “Review chronology: order date is different from delivery e…