Clarification for “Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected”: the point beginning “Use clear evidence-status labels and dates, and li…

Correction note for “Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist”: retain the wording beginning “Bring an accurate list of medicines and supplements …

Case 92 — Redacting a review: which details should stay private? · documentation exercise Clarification for “Redacting a review: which details should …

Case 15 — Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription Quote a short relevant phrase and identify the official leaflet version without…

Case 23 — Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment Method note for “Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment”: use “Descri…

Case 20 — A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance Clarification for “A source review checklist that separates evidence from…

Case 7 — Review chronology: order date is different from delivery evidence A timeline combines a payment screenshot and a delivery claim. How should e…

Clarification for “Privacy in medicine photographs”: the point beginning “Remove names, addresses, prescription numbers, barcodes…” belongs to the que…

Remove names, addresses, prescription numbers, barcodes and account identifiers. Retain the unedited original privately for a pharmacist; avoid postin…

Case 10 — Conflicting advice: identify the original source Correction note for “Conflicting advice: identify the original source”: retain the wording …

Clarification for “Reporting a suspected adverse reaction”: the point beginning “Record the product, timing and a factual description of…” belongs to …

Correction note for “Reporting a suspected adverse reaction”: retain the wording beginning “Record the product, timing and a factual description of…” …