Case 29 — A source review checklist that separates evidence from reassurance · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A source review checkli…

Reader check for “Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction”: distinguish the discussion point “Use the official regulator or manufacturer n…

Case 44 — Unexpected packaging: documenting a discrepancy safely · source wording exercise Method note for “Unexpected packaging: documenting a discre…

Case 47 — Redacting a review: which details should stay private? · source wording exercise A draft review includes a shipping label, a medicine label …

Case 48 — Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Source-review index: unresolved,…

Case 27 — Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them · source wording exercise Method note for “Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settl…

Limit of the answer in “Reporting a suspected adverse reaction”: “Record the product, timing and a factual description of…” is an excerpt from the dis…

Batch and product information may be relevant to a pharmacist or regulator. Decide what belongs in that private enquiry rather than automatically publ…

Case 12 — Reporting a suspected adverse reaction Correction note for “Reporting a suspected adverse reaction”: retain the wording beginning “Record th…

Preserve the packaging and receipt, redact personal information and consult a licensed pharmacist or relevant regulator. A photograph cannot confirm c…

Case 3 — Official information: save the version and access date Clarification for “Official information: save the version and access date”: the point …

Clarification for “Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction”: the point beginning “Use the official regulator or manufacturer notice and…” …

Case 13 — A dated correction to a source discussion Correction note for “A dated correction to a source discussion”: retain the wording beginning “Ide…