Case 26 — Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Packaging evidence: a…

Use opaque redactions in a flattened exported copy, then reopen that copy and inspect it at full size. Do not rely on a translucent marker or a revers…

Case 38 — Dispatch email versus carrier acceptance: how should the timeline read? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Dispatch email versus ca…

Case 41 — Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them · source wording exercise Method note for “Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settl…

Case 42 — Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Delivery feedback is not a medicine-qual…

Case 21 — Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing Limit of the answer in “Discontinued packaging versus an unverified listing”: “Look for …

Method note for “A dated correction to a source discussion”: use “Preserve a dated correction and avoid substituting…” as a row heading in a proposed …

Case 7 — Review chronology: order date is different from delivery evidence A timeline combines a payment screenshot and a delivery claim. How should e…

Clarification for “A dated correction to a source discussion”: the point beginning “Identify the specific statement, explain the evidence gap and…” be…

Clarification for “Cold-chain questions: missing records are still missing”: the point beginning “It does not establish conditions…” belongs to the qu…

Keep transaction-service observations separate from product-quality claims. A refund or a delivered parcel can resolve a service issue without establi…

Case 8 — Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction A shared recall headline lacks a batch number and country. Which details determine whethe…