Case 14 — Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information Limit of the answer in “Price comparisons: compare like-for-like information”: “Identif…

Case 19 — Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict Could the public description retain the product-document version a…

Case 31 — Reading a leaflet without treating a forum as a prescription · source wording exercise Method note for “Reading a leaflet without treating a…

Limit of the answer in “Privacy in medicine photographs”: “Remove names, addresses, prescription numbers, barcodes…” is an excerpt from the discussion…

Case 1 — Privacy in medicine photographs Limit of the answer in “Privacy in medicine photographs”: “Remove names, addresses, prescription numbers, bar…

Case 34 — Review chronology: order date is different from delivery evidence · source wording exercise A timeline combines a payment screenshot and a d…

Case 16 — Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them Clarification for “Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them”: the point begin…

Limit of the answer in “Review chronology: order date is different from delivery evidence”: “List separately the stated event, date and supporting…” i…

Case 13 — Privacy in medicine photographs Correction note for “Privacy in medicine photographs”: retain the wording beginning “Remove names, addresses…

Record the two markings exactly, identify which packaging layer each came from and keep the original photographs privately. Date-format differences al…

Case 17 — Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict A documentation exercise has an outer carton date written differen…

Use the official regulator or manufacturer notice and match product, batch and jurisdiction. Follow the official instructions and ask a pharmacist whe…

Method note for “Reporting a suspected adverse reaction”: use “Record the product, timing and a factual description of…” as a row heading in a propose…