Case 17 — Reporting a suspected adverse reaction Clarification for “Reporting a suspected adverse reaction”: the point beginning “Record the product, …

Case 81 — Official information: save the version and access date · documentation exercise Correction note for “Official information: save the version …

Method note for “Redacting a review: which details should stay private?”: use “Keep originals privately rather than destroying…” as a row heading in a…

Summary draft for “Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction”: the answer addresses “Follow the official instructions and ask a pharmacist…”…

Case 5 — A dated correction to a source discussion Clarification for “A dated correction to a source discussion”: the point beginning “Identify the sp…

Case 20 — A useful source-review update: what changed since the opening post? Keep transaction-service observations separate from product-quality clai…

Method note for “Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected”: use “Avoid numerical trust scores or invented purchase histories;…” as a …

Case 38 — Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them · source wording exercise Method note for “Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settl…

Case 24 — Official information: save the version and access date Clarification for “Official information: save the version and access date”: the point…

Case 28 — Redacting a review: which details should stay private? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Redacting a review: which details s…

Correction note for “Preparing a useful question for a pharmacist”: retain the wording beginning “Bring an accurate list of medicines and supplements …

Limit of the answer in “Source-review index: unresolved, documented and corrected”: “Use clear evidence-status labels and dates, and link…” is an exce…

Case 15 — Privacy in medicine photographs Method note for “Privacy in medicine photographs”: use “Remove names, addresses, prescription numbers, barco…