Community

Start with your question. Search first, choose the closest subject and keep personal details private. Posting guidelines
CorrectionLog 00090
CorrectionLog 00090
@pharmacy-00090

CorrectionLog 00090 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: Documentation desk: privacy, product records and evidence gaps · PHARMACY-30919

Case 22 — Redacting a review: which details should stay private? Batch and product information may be relevant to a pharmacist or regulator. Decide wh…

3 weeks ago
Reply
RE: Review corrections: what changed and what remains unresolved · PHARMACY-30568

Case 11 — Packaging evidence: a mismatch is a question, not an authenticity verdict Record the two markings exactly, identify which packaging layer ea…

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment · PHARMACY-30066

Describe it as a delivery observation with its evidence and limits. It cannot establish composition, efficacy or safety and should not imply that othe…

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Source-review workshop: dated records, promises and resolutions · PHARMACY-29469

Case 11 — Unexpected packaging: documenting a discrepancy safely Correction note for “Unexpected packaging: documenting a discrepancy safely”: retain …

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Documentation desk: privacy, product records and evidence gaps · PHARMACY-28599

Case 75 — A dated correction to a source discussion · documentation exercise An earlier thread included an unsupported assurance. What should an edito…

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction · PHARMACY-27636

Limit of the answer in “Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction”: “Use the official regulator or manufacturer notice and…” is an excerpt f…

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them · PHARMACY-26518

Method note for “Expiry questions: why appearance cannot settle them”: use “Check the original label and ask a pharmacist about…” as a row heading in …

7 months ago
Reply
RE: Official information: save the version and access date · PHARMACY-25343

Method note for “Official information: save the version and access date”: use “Link to the issuing organisation, note the document version and…” as a …

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Privacy in medicine photographs · PHARMACY-24033

Clarification for “Privacy in medicine photographs”: the point beginning “Remove names, addresses, prescription numbers, barcodes…” belongs to the que…

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Review corrections: what changed and what remains unresolved · PHARMACY-22448

Case 10 — A dated correction to a source discussion Summary draft for “A dated correction to a source discussion”: the answer addresses “Identify the …

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Source-review workshop: dated records, promises and resolutions · PHARMACY-20169

Case 28 — Recall notices: verify the product and jurisdiction · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Recall notices: verify the product and juri…

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Review corrections: what changed and what remains unresolved · PHARMACY-19200

Case 14 — Reporting a suspected adverse reaction Correction note for “Reporting a suspected adverse reaction”: retain the wording beginning “Record th…

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Source-review workshop: dated records, promises and resolutions · PHARMACY-17881

Case 18 — Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment Summary draft for “Delivery feedback is not a medicine-quality assessment”: the answe…

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Documentation desk: privacy, product records and evidence gaps · PHARMACY-16563

Case 29 — Unexpected packaging: documenting a discrepancy safely · source wording exercise Method note for “Unexpected packaging: documenting a discre…

2 years ago
Page 1 / 2