Read the methods section. It is the only part that says whether the conclusion is allowed to exist. Currently on ginkgo biloba myself.

Function over score.

If it needs three other compounds to notice, you have not tested the first one.

My rule, after years of this: if it cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.

Fifteen years of this and the function column is the only one that changed anything for me. Also, one page of history, printed, handed over at the sta…

Same shape here, different drug. The thing that helped was documenting the refusal rather than re-arguing it. They refer rather than write.

Same here.

It gets smaller. Not easy, smaller. That distinction kept me going.

I would stop trying to convey how bad it is and start saying what you want them to do.

Three questions kill most of the confidence in a thread like this: sample size, blinding, who paid.