Quick question about threaded replies before I do something daft.
Disclosure in the first line saves a moderator five minutes and a member an argument.
The short version is that the rule exists because of a specific pattern of posts.
Happy to be told it already exists.
It gets smaller. Not easy, smaller. That distinction kept me going.
Half of what people describe as tolerance is a change in the underlying condition, and the two need different answers.
Ten percent cuts. Slower is faster. How long have you been on threaded replies?
Followed, this answered three questions I had.
Same shape here, different drug. The thing that helped was documenting the refusal rather than re-arguing it. They refer rather than write.
Followed, this answered three questions I had. Not on threaded replies but the pattern is familiar.
Reference ranges differ between labs, so comparing two reports is close to meaningless.
Worth asking what specifically was measured. Pain scores move with mood and function does not.
Function over score.
The last ten percent of a taper takes as long as the first ninety. Nobody says so until you are in it.
The rule exists because of a specific pattern of posts, and it is always that pattern.
Interdose restlessness is distinct from the original symptom and worth naming separately. How long have you been on threaded replies?
Ten percent cuts, of the current dose not the original. That is the arithmetic that keeps it survivable.
Reference ranges differ between labs, so comparing two reports is close to meaningless.
