Loose evidence is not nothing, but a washout either side is the only reason to trust your own take.
Same here.
My rule, after years of this: if it cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing. How long have you been on vitamin B12?
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation.
Log dose, time and sleep. Ten seconds a day and it turns the anecdote into something you can look at.
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread.
Reconstitution arithmetic is only half the problem. The other half is what was in the vial.
Underdosing and tolerance are indistinguishable from the inside, and everyone picks the flattering explanation. Accumulation worry was my main issue with vitamin B12 too.
Narrow conclusion.
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.
This board overrates bloodwork. A number moving is not the outcome you wanted.
Sterility is the part people wave through and it is the part that actually bites.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?
An inconclusive account is useful if it stops the next person mistaking a story for a controlled comparison.