Bloodwork question about CoQ10. Baseline, a fortnight in, and the numbers moved in a direction I did not expect.
Loose evidence is not the same as no evidence and people overcorrect in both directions.
There is a serious question about whether the studied form matches what is sold, and nobody in a thread can answer it.
My rule now: if a claim cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.
Interested in the methods more than the conclusion.
Sterility is the part people wave through and it is the part that actually bites.
Where does the human data stop and the extrapolation begin? That is the whole thread.
Reconstitution arithmetic is only half the problem. The other half is what was in the vial.
Sterility is the part people wave through and it is the part that actually bites.
How long before you can reasonably say something is or is not doing anything?