Trying to separate three different claims about glycine: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
My rule now: if a claim cannot survive being written down with the numbers attached, it is marketing.
Posting to be argued with, mainly.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Read methods. Currently on glycine myself.
Test one thing at a time. It feels slower and it is the only way to learn anything.
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero? A fortnight in on glycine and it lines up.
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.
Baseline first. Without a baseline the after picture is decoration.
Most of the popular protocol is borrowed from a clinical population and applied to healthy people without comment.
Is a baseline blood test really necessary before starting something like this?
What is the first thing you would read if you were starting from zero?