Trying to separate three different claims about glycine: that it is the right molecule, that it is the right dose, and that it does something useful.
The effect size I actually noticed is roughly a third of what the write-ups imply, and it took four months to be sure.
There is a serious question about whether the studied form matches what is sold, and nobody in a thread can answer it.
Sample size, blinding, and who paid for it. Those three questions kill most of the confidence in most of these threads.
I would rather have a narrow conclusion and be right than a broad one and be interesting.
What would change your mind about this?
Same here.
Side effects was my main issue with glycine too.
Cold storage, light protection, date on the vial. Boring, removes half the variables.
Reconstitution arithmetic is only half the problem. The other half is what was in the vial.
Nobody has ever been talked out of a stack by a stranger on the internet.