Long post, sorry. Magnesium citrate: what actually has human evidence behind it, and what is extrapolation from animals?
What surprised me is how much of the perceived benefit was routine and attention rather than pharmacology.
There is a serious question about whether the studied form matches what is sold, and nobody in a thread can answer it.
Most of the popular protocols are borrowed from clinical populations and applied to healthy people without comment.
If you need three other compounds to notice the first one, you have not tested the first one.
Would like a narrow answer rather than an enthusiastic one.
Baseline first.
Stupid question: how do you know whether what is in the vial matches the label at all?
Narrow conclusion, briefly right. Broad conclusion, interestingly wrong. I know which I keep choosing.